About
A free weekly collection of criminal law links - for practitioners, law students, and anyone with an interest in the criminal justice system of England and Wales.
Curated by Sam Willis, a barrister at 5 King's Bench Walk.
News
'Sentencing Council suspends plans for new guidelines amid ‘two-tier’ justice row'
The Sentencing Council has caved to pressure and suspended plans for new guidelines which could have led to different sentences depending on age, sex and ethnicity, as ministers prepare to force through a law to overturn proposals. The climbdown – hours before the guidance would have come into force – comes after a standoff with the Ministry of Justice which will use emergency legislation to override the guidelines, which had provoked claims of a “two-tier” justice system...
The Sentencing Council confirmed after a meeting with Mahmood on Monday that it “would not introduce a guideline when there is a draft bill due for imminent introduction that would make it unlawful. On that basis, the council, an independent statutory body, has chosen to delay the in-force date of the guideline pending such legislation taking effect”...
The suspension comes at the end of a breakdown in relations between Mahmood and the Sentencing Council. After the guidance was first published, Mahmood wrote to the chair of the council, Lord Justice Davis, calling for the change to be scrapped and insisting there would “never be a two-tier sentencing approach under my watch”. Davis had suggested he would defy that pressure on Friday, however, saying the council had concluded “the guideline did not require revision” and blaming a “widespread misunderstanding” for the backlash...
'Minister to review sentencing council after 'two-tier' row'
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said she will review the role of the Sentencing Council following a "two-tier" justice row over its latest guidelines. Labour and the Conservatives have criticised the council's plan to advise judges in England and Wales to seek extra information before deciding how to punish offenders from certain minority groups. The guidelines have now been abandoned after ministers tabled an emergency law to override them on Tuesday. But Mahmood also told MPs she would launch a review of the "proper role" of the council and how it makes guidelines, to begin in the coming months...
Mahmood will also pilot the Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence reports) Bill through Parliament after it was published on Tuesday. If passed, the bill would prevent future sentencing guidelines about pre-sentence reports "framed by reference to different personal characteristics of an offender"...
Veteran Labour MP Dianne Abbott said she was "astonished" that Mahmood thought judges could be swayed by "guidelines in relation to how they sentence black and brown defendants". "Repeated statistical analysis has demonstrated what some of us consider to be unfairness in relation to black and brown people, and the criminal justice system," she said. Abbott also warned against ministers interfering with the courts. "This is not the United States, our political system and our judicial system are entirely separate," she said.
'Victims attend parole hearings to see offenders held to account'
For the first time, victims from across England and Wales will be able to apply to observe private Parole Board hearings held to decide if a prisoner is safe to be released. It will let victims see first-hand how offenders are held accountable for their crimes, their subsequent behaviour in prison and their work to prove they can live law-abiding lives if released. A pilot in the South West of England and Greater Manchester found victims were reassured to see the level of scrutiny that prisoners are put under before any decision to release them is made. It is hoped, therefore, that these changes will provide more victims with a greater understanding of the decisions made by the Parole Board while ensuring they feel more involved in the process...
Victims who are part of the Victim Contact Scheme will apply to the Parole Board to attend hearings with the help of their victim liaison officer and those who are successful in applying will observe remotely so they don’t have to sit with the perpetrator. They will then be provided with in-person support during the hearing and victims will be directed towards additional support following the proceedings, such as counselling, if necessary...
'UK and Vietnam sign agreement to tackle human trafficking'
The UK and Vietnam are joining forces to clamp down on human trafficking by committing to a joint action plan. The agreement was signed yesterday, 31 March, at the Border Security Summit on Organised Immigration Crime in London by the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Vietnam Minister for Public Security General Luong Tam Quang. The agreement commits both countries to stop traffickers from exploiting vulnerable people by discouraging dangerous journeys, enhancing information sharing and co-ordinating efforts to disrupt trafficking. It builds on a memorandum of understanding signed by the 2 countries in 2018...
Delivery of the joint action plan is supported by up to £1 million of funding over the next year through the Home Office Modern Slavery Fund. Since 2018 the UK has invested over £7 million to strengthen Vietnam’s anti-trafficking response through the Modern Slavery Fund which has identified 720 victims of trafficking and migrants in vulnerable situations, reached over 7 million people with awareness campaigns and educated 1,936 aspiring migrants to the risks of human trafficking.
'CCRC sets up case study hub to assist potential applicants'
The Criminal Cases Review Commission has launched a case studies hub to help ‘inform potential applicants’ about the organisation’s work, test and processes. Case studies will be published in the hub fortnightly. Each article will link to individual case studies from the CCRC’s case library, which launched last September and lists all referrals the CCRC has made since 1997, when it started its work. Current articles cover unreliable confession cases, asylum and immigration investigations and referrals of imprisonment for public protection sentences.
A CCRC spokesperson said: ‘These thematic case studies will help people understand more fully the range of the work carried out by our team, and the basis on which our many hundreds of referrals have been made. We hope this will assist potential applicants and support our work in finding and investigating possible miscarriages of justice.’
Cases
R v Layden [2025] UKSC 12
Under section 7(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (“the 1968 Act”) where the Court of Appeal allows an appeal against conviction it may order the defendant to be retried if it appears to the court “that the interests of justice so require”. Section 8 of the 1968 Act sets out “Supplementary provisions as to retrial”. These include, at subsection (1), that the defendant “shall be tried on a fresh indictment preferred by the direction of the Court of Appeal” and that arraignment may not take place after the end of two months from the date of the order for retrial without the leave of the Court of Appeal...
In the present case, the retrial took place without the respondent being arraigned within two months of the order for retrial or at all. No application to the Court of Appeal was made under section 8 by either the prosecution or the defence. The respondent successfully appealed against his conviction on the grounds that in these circumstances the Crown Court had no jurisdiction to try him...
Bearing in mind the wording of sections 7 and 8, the purpose of those provisions, the alternative to total invalidity and the consequences of invalidity, as outlined above, I conclude that Parliament cannot fairly have intended total invalidity to follow from non-compliance with the procedural requirements of section 8. For all these reasons, I conclude that a failure to comply with the procedural requirements in section 8(1) of the 1968 Act does not deprive the Crown Court of jurisdiction to re-try a defendant notwithstanding an order of the Court of Appeal under section 7(1) of the 1968 Act. I would therefore allow the appeal and overrule the Court of Appeal decision in Llewellyn.
Other
'We need to talk about the Sentencing Council'
The past few weeks have seen significant political and media attention lavished on the Sentencing Council of England and Wales, a small independent non-departmental public body which has hitherto attracted little interest from anybody outside the criminal justice system. What began as a sprinkling of misinformation on social media has snowballed into a political and legal crisis, with the government introducing primary legislation to block part of the Sentencing Council’s most recent Sentencing Guideline, the Sentencing Council postponing the controversial Guideline on the eve of its introduction, the Lord Chancellor announcing a review of the Council’s role and functions, and politicians from both main parties calling for the Council’s outright abolition. So it is worth taking a few minutes to look at precisely what has happened, and where we go from here...